Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 17:33
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Early Humans Did More Than Just Walk—They Mastered a Surprising Skill Set - Indian Defence Review
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Traders Scour for ‘Elusive’ Catalyst to Push S&P 500 to Record - Bloomberg
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Chinese-Owned Company Halts Work on Factory to Make Batteries in U.S. - WSJ
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.